12 23Thu06202013

Settings

Font Size

Back Opinion Old and new hospitals must work together

Old and new hospitals must work together

  • PDF

BUENAS yan håfa adai todu hamyo! My previous Across the Aisle article several weeks ago was on the topic of the new hospital, and the positive benefits I believe it will bring to the people of Guam. Since then, I had the pleasure of attending a presentation, which updated the general public on the progress of hospital construction, the anticipated economic impact, and workforce needs.

I was extremely pleased by the information provided at the presentation, mostly because the hospital is set as a partnership with Guam, and the economic impact it will bring is not a result of the anticipated military realignment.

During the presentation, I couldn’t help notice the beaming smiles on the faces of the foundation members. These individuals worked tirelessly over a five-year period; and this presentation was a manifest of their planning into a reality – in about two years, this hospital will be open for business.

We all know how badly we need more bed space as well as advanced medical treatment on-island, and this new approach is very reassuring.

It was then that I remembered a recent oversight hearing of our current hospital, wherein concerns were expressed about the regulatory needs in order to ensure there is no double standard of care for the people of Guam, regardless of economic status.

Of the many concerns raised, most notable are:

  • GMH management stated a $35 million subsidy might be needed to address a loss of insured client base;
  • A possible mass exodus of medical experts from GMH to the new hospital; and
  • Arrangements need to be made between the hospitals for complex procedures being performed on self-pay patients.

These are extremely valid concerns, so I propose that we empanel a group of experts, much like the group formed for the new hospital, to ensure an established working relationship between the hospitals from day one.

Also, because the aforementioned concerns have already been discussed, more communication is needed in order to assure our community that the benefits associated with the new hospital will impact all; and our current public hospital will continue to be a center of excellence – as exhibited by the recent upholding of accreditation by JCAHO.

Congratulations are in order for the staff and management of both hospitals! I commend all projects, such as the new hospital, that are coming to Guam to serve our people.

Biba taotao tano yan biba Guåhan!!

Comments  

 
0 #5 GuamUSA 2012-04-18 05:00
In the end, even with all the grandstanding and attempts to garner votes....this is a private hospital and we all know what that means.

As an insurance holder, I have a small issue with the assumption of some that this will be GMH 2. This will not be, and I will expect to be treated as a paying patient, with the full undertanding and expectation that the top notch doctors and staff are there because of paying customers, that the bills will continue to be paid, and that beds, medicine and superior care will abound because they are private and not run by Gov Guam. Just sayin..
 
 
-4 #4 Da 2012-03-29 01:23
[quote name="john smith, aka Trebor

This year dave davis will be screeming to be discriminated upon,

while hundreds of Guam voters have been cheated and no body cares, why should we for davis

That is the Guam way...
 
 
-2 #3 Da 2012-03-29 01:19
Quoting john smith:
:cry: :cry:

" These are extremely valid concerns, so I propose that we empanel a group of experts, much like the group formed for the new hospital, to ensure an established working relationship between the hospitals from da...



This should work. On one side we have Gulag Memorial, on the other The New Hospital, and in the middle we have a panel of " experts " to decide and make rules and tell us who is right and who is wrong and if either Gulag or The New fail to obey the panel, they will be fined, closed down, have their licenses revoked etc ..?

A panel of experts is kinda like the one thing we do not need to muck things up. There is no need for this panel, as Peter Sgro and Gulag Memorial can meet, if they want, and work out policies and procedures by themselves.

But if we need a panel of experts, I suggest judy senator be the head of it. We have all seen what a great job she has done with the Marine buildup.....

Hast[censored]

:P


No, Trebor will dig out the red letters and shout away,
need to get my Imodium, so I wont hit trebor walking out...
 
 
0 #2 john smith 2012-03-28 10:44
:cry: :cry:

" These are extremely valid concerns, so I propose that we empanel a group of experts, much like the group formed for the new hospital, to ensure an established working relationship between the hospitals from day one.."

==

This should work. On one side we have Gulag Memorial, on the other The New Hospital, and in the middle we have a panel of " experts " to decide and make rules and tell us who is right and who is wrong and if either Gulag or The New fail to obey the panel, they will be fined, closed down, have their licenses revoked etc ..?

A panel of experts is kinda like the one thing we do not need to muck things up. There is no need for this panel, as Peter Sgro and Gulag Memorial can meet, if they want, and work out policies and procedures by themselves.

But if we need a panel of experts, I suggest judy senator be the head of it. We have all seen what a great job she has done with the Marine buildup.....

Hasta

:P
 
 
0 #1 john smith 2012-03-28 10:35
:zzz :zzz :zzz

In this election year speech, I counted the word " I " seven or more times.

Any time a person is campaining to the nickle seats they always start and end their speech in Chamorro.

Is this racial and do us white voters feel insulted ?.....Hasta
 

Please Login to post a comment.