12 23Mon05202013

Settings

Font Size

Back Local News $150,000 for superintendent

$150,000 for superintendent

  • PDF
  • Prev
  • 1 of 2
  • Next

But allowances removed from contract

AFTER deliberating the details of the proposed contract for new Guam Department of Education Superintendent Jon Fernandez, the Guam Education Board in a special meeting yesterday approved to increase his annual salary from $125,000 to $150,000, but without the additional allowances proposed in an earlier draft of the contract.

Before GEB unanimously agreed on the amount, several board members made it clear they are against providing additional perks to Fernandez, emphasizing GDOE cannot pay for these proposed allowances.

During the contract deliberations, GEB member Rosie Tainatongo expressed her concern about the financial capacity of GDOE to provide the additional allowances for Fernandez.

Tainatongo said she has thoroughly reviewed and analyzed the contract and with all of the allowances and benefits plugged in, Fernandez will be receiving a total of $370,236 during his first year as superintendent.

At the end of Fernandez’s four-year contract, she added, GDOE would end up paying him $1,849,892.

“We don’t have the money. We have the budget of $125,000 for the superintendent. But there are a lot of things that we lack. We don’t have supplies for kids out in the schools,” Tainatongo emphasized.

“I’m sorry but, [are] we saying there is no money for the department but we are willing to go ahead and pay this out?” Tainatongo asked the board.

Another board member, Joe San Agustin, also firmly opposed the additional allowances for the superintendent, stating, “If the board had announced earlier that the minimum is $125,000 and we could negotiate higher, I wouldn’t have any problems with that.”

“Why don’t we give him a set salary and let him pay for what he needs to pay for,” San Agustin said.

San Agustin also put forward the motion to approve an annual salary of $150,000 for the superintendent but without the allowances earlier proposed by the board. The board members unanimously approved the motion.

Contract revisions

During the GEB special meeting, the board also allowed the new superintendent to request GDOE to reimburse reasonable expenses incurred for shipping his personal effects to Guam, as long as the amount does not exceed $15,000.

The items that were removed from the contract include the housing allowance of $2,000 per month, working facilities and technology allowance of $300 per month, and automobile allowance of $650 per month. Also scrapped was the section on establishing a supplemental retirement plan for the superintendent.

A section entitling the superintendent to receive one year salary, allowance, and compensation upon termination was also scrapped from the contract. In addition, the board decided that the superintendent may receive a 2 percent salary increase per year, based on satisfactory performance.

Also scrapped from the contract was the section on “entertainment allowance,” which states the “board will provide for reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of the superintendent’s official duties.”

Satisfied

After the meeting, Tainatongo said she is satisfied after the board decided to cut off some of the expenses.

“I am happy we have deleted a lot of those things because I wouldn’t have supported a $300,000 contract for the superintendent,” Tainatongo said.

In terms of prioritizing resources, she said GDOE should put kids first before anything else.

Tainatongo stated: “I believe the department exists to provide resources that the kids need. We have to educate them and prepare them for the future. And of course, we should have a superintendent to direct all of this and to be on track and to make sure that we provide all of the necessary services for the kids.”

Meanwhile, San Agustin clarified that he is not questioning Fernandez’s credentials or capacity to lead the department. According to San Agustin, he is just making sure there is transparency in the negotiation and hiring process for the new superintendent.

GEB is hoping to have Fernandez on board by June 1 this year.

Comments  

 
+1 #5 Virgie 2012-05-18 12:34
Finally some of our Board members are finally seeing the light. Even to give the New Superintendent a raise and delete his Christmas list is still unfair. It automatiically states 125,000 and no Perks, so why even bother with his lists. Remeber Our Children comes first. Doe knows they don't have the money so why not revote to search for another Superintendent. Ms. Laling Taitano and Mr. Malay is doing a suoerb job so far. so why not reselect another Superintendent for the next School Year, please reconsider. I know that DOE has to have the Accountability, but this so much of what Mr. Fernandez is asking. Like i said Our Governor is one good example for what he did, cut his salary, and then Mr. Fernandez comes along with his listing . Get real were hurting, Its like maybe he can just go and stay at the Governors house for hes asking for all this ridiculous extras.. Please Re-Select for another Superintendent.
 
 
-5 #4 Benjamin 2012-05-17 11:48
Quoting Mathew:
Paying the going rate, apparently, is only for administrators, in this town, and then the stakeholders expect miracles, I guess. Or, maybe, there is something more to it than just paying the industry norm. Those who support this probably want the administrator in question to make those "tough decisions" such as union-busting, elimination of employee positions, etc. Sort of like the CEOs' who make billions of dollars for downsizing their workforce even in defense industry outfits such as Lockheed Martin Marietta where workers stand to lose their jobs even as their pension funds get turned over.


This is a good point. I can name several educators who don't even make half that salary and who work at least as hard as a superintendent. For instance, what about Collette Beausoleau or Robert Abaday two fine teachers who gave a fantastic presentation at the Cafeteria during the board meet this week.. The going rate for educators of their experience is at least 15 000 than what they are making. Hmm...can they negotiate as well for an increase in salary?
 
 
-2 #3 Mathew 2012-05-17 09:38
Paying the going rate, apparently, is only for administrators, in this town, and then the stakeholders expect miracles, I guess. Or, maybe, there is something more to it than just paying the industry norm. Those who support this probably want the administrator in question to make those "tough decisions" such as union-busting, elimination of employee positions, etc. Sort of like the CEOs' who make billions of dollars for downsizing their workforce even in defense industry outfits such as Lockheed Martin Marietta where workers stand to lose their jobs even as their pension funds get turned over.
 
 
+1 #2 Benjamin 2012-05-17 08:00
I think Mr. Fernandez knew what position he was applying for and the salary that went with it. Hence the negotiations should be reopened to attract better candidates or at least a wider pool of candidates who might not have applied due to the incorrect salary that was advertised . Is this not so??? It should be SOP if not the Law. Senators what do you think???
 
 
+1 #1 Mitch Stevens 2012-05-17 07:57
Pay the going rate, 240K as per industry standards, and expect results. Being cheap will never help the system. Accountability is what is needed.
 

Please Login to post a comment.